Posts Tagged ‘Carbon Emissions’

Why we need to change

January 27th, 2012

Greenpeace recently commissioned a survey to determine the true cost of coal to South Africa. The survey, done by the University of Pretoria’s Business Enterprises unit, delivered truly shocking results.

More than 90% of the electricity in South Africa is generated by coal powered stations, and Eskom isn’t planning on changing that any time soon. Eskom is currently building two more coal powered stations, Kusile and Medupi, which, on completion will be among the largest in the world. The budget to build these new stations is R385 billion and each will have a life span of 50 years! Even worse is the fact that Kusile will produce up to 37 million tons of carbon dioxide every year.

This has led to South Africa becoming one of the biggest polluters in the world. South Africa is the fifth highest producer of coal, and the sixth highest user in the world.

The other side of the spectrum is even worse. Only 2 GWh (Gigawatt) of South Africa’s 237 000 Gwh is produced from wind power. The fact that they are currently building these two massive stations has also meant that there is no funding  available for the development of renewable energy sources .Eskom is lax in it’s efforts to build more solar and wind powered stations, and that needs to change!

The South African government wants to create 111 000 new jobs in the current energy industry, but this study has found that 149 000 new jobs can be created, if government invested in the renewable energy sector.

Greenpeace also recently published a different report entitled ‘The Advanced Energy [R]evolution: A sustainable energy outlook for South Africa’, in which it outlines key aspects of the renewable energy sector. They state that if government gradually phased out coal power, and invested in sun and wind power, half of South Africa’s energy could come from renewable sources by 2030, thus eliminating the need to build the Kusile power station.

Eskom argues that these stations are necessary in order to provide electricity to the nearly 10 million people living without it, but this is not true. It would take much less time and money to build renewable electricity stations close to areas that need it most, and so doing, be able to provide 10 million people with safe, renewable energy.

The easiest way to petition against the building of these coal stations is at http://www.greenpeace.org/africa/en/use-me-more/ . Here you can sign up to the Greenpeace petition to get government to better utilize sun and wind power.

It is up to you to make the change. So sign up, and help protect our beautiful planet.

(This is a post by our intern Kristian Meijer)

(Image by Senor Codo, CC by-SA 2.0, via Flickr)

The elimination of carbon emissions: is it all just hot gas?

February 7th, 2011

We’ve definitely got a problem; we consume so much fuel in pretty much all aspects of our lives that the carbon emissions levels are dangerously high. The only possible answer to this pollutant is for us to revert back to living in caves, cooking over an open fire, right? Well, according to UK-based company, Cella Energy; wrong.

Apparently Cell Energy’s scientists have been working on the development of a synthetic form of fuel thay may have a significant affect on the world’s gas consumption. The project has been going for four years, and CEO Stephen Voller now believes the fuel is ready to be revealed.

Imagine driving around in a completely emissions-free car, or not having to worry whether the products you buy have used gallons of fuel to get to you. Voller recently spoke to Gizmag: “We have developed new micro-beads that can be used in an existing gasoline or petrol vehicle to replace oil-based fuels”. He continued by explaining that, surprisingly, the beads can be used in existing vehicles without modifications.

The fuel is hydrogen-based and, according to Cella Energy, it doesn’t produce carbon emissions when used. If the wonder-fuel is as clean and impressive as it sounds it will mean that people around the world can stop worrying about the environmental effects of driving around in their cars. It will also mean that dipping and peaking oil prices will no longer matter.

Currently it’s expensive to embark on a “green” lifestyle; electric vehicles (EVs) and charging stations cost a pretty penny to buy and install. But the fuel, which is being hailed on the Cella Energy website as “New Oil” or “Oil 2.0”, could be the cost-effective answer.

But as TrendHunter reported: “It almost sounds to good to be true”. Storage of the element has been user-unfriendly causing hydrogen to be a fairytale fuel option. When burned it produces pure water, so would be the perfect solution to all the pollution currently being pumped into our atmosphere by cars, but everyday people don’t know how to manage the element.

According to the lead scientist heading the project for the UK’s Science and Technology Facilities Council, Professor Stephen Bennington, this will no longer be a problem. They have developed a new storage technique that should see the element become a more viable option.

Guess we’ll have to wait and see; who knows, if it’s taken four years to develop the method, perhaps it may take another four to get the project into the real world.

Retrofitting drive heats up China’s icy homes

January 20th, 2011

China is on a mission to reduce its carbon emissions and change the perception that it’s apathetic toward climate change to one that reflects a proactive attitude. In 2006 it came out with a five year plan to reduce its energy intensity, placing municipalities and commercial and industrial sectors under enormous pressure to meet quotas. The intentions have been good, but as is to be expected with such a large-scale undertaking, results have been mixed.

The good

One of the success stories has to do with retrofitting old buildings to make them more energy efficient. This has been particularly important in the north-eastern regions of Japan where cold fronts come courtesy of Siberia’s frozen tundra and temperatures have been known to drop to -40 degrees Celsius. Energy consumption is staggering as homes, flats and businesses have the heating on for at least half the year.

Cities such as Harbin, Qingdao and Lanzhou have taken a layered approach to the problem and are retrofitting residential buildings with five layers of insulation in the walls, insulation for roofs and even better windows in an effort to keep out the cold. Some residents have compared the insulation to a new winter wardrobe and refer to coats and hats when talking about their improved walls and roofs.

According to Harbin officials (cited in a National Geographic article), the retrofitting drive will increase energy efficiency by as much as 50%.

The bad

The retrofitting drive has received some criticism for the almost negligent manner in which some people think it has been implemented. There have been complaints of poor construction and inferior construction materials. There have also been safety concerns, particularly with regard to flammability.

Other problems include energy pricing systems. Residents are typically charged a flat rate based on the size of their home or flat and not on the actual amount of energy used. This leads to a lot of wastage as people leave the heating on just because they can.

There are also few incentives for people and businesses to save energy and subsidies barely merit a mention.

The future

According to Mark Levine, head of the China Energy Group at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the country needs a structural change in the economy. But China is reluctant to take drastic action in this regard in case it derails their development drive, which has gained significant momentum over the past decade or so and helped the country become a super power.

There is also the fact that China needs to develop to accommodate its growing population, especially as urbanisation increases.

In addition to an economic overhaul, the Chinese government also needs to come up with a comprehensive plan to address energy consumption, as opposed to setting vague (and ambitious) targets. It also needs to provide its people with reasons to change. Unless change starts from the top and comes from within it’s unlikely that a positive attitude will filter down to the masses.

(image by FloNight (Sydney Poore) and Russell Poore, via Wikimedia Commons)

Will China lead the fight against climate change?

January 17th, 2011

When Beijing hosted the Olympics in 2008 much hue and cry was made of the appalling pollution and the fact that one very seldom saw blue sky. There were rumours that the government went to extreme measures to bring the level of contamination down, at least temporarily, such as limiting the number of cars on the city’s roads and shooting chemicals in the sky (which seems counter-productive). Whatever it did, worked and very few athletes complained of the conditions. But after the crowds left the smog and smoke were back and Beijing’s citizens dug out their surgical masks.

China is notorious for its carbon emissions, as well as its apparent reluctance to do anything about them. The perception is not helped much by public statements like those issued in February 2010 by Su Wei, the chief negotiator of China for climate change talks in Copenhagen and the director of the department for combating climate change under the National Development Reform Commission. According to Su Wei, China would not set an upper limit on greenhouse gas emissions as “China’s greenhouse gas emissions have to grow correspondingly as the country still has a long way to go in improving people’s livelihoods and eradicating poverty”.

Su Wei added, however, that the country would do everything it could to fight the negative effects caused by global warming and cut carbon intensity. Not many people took comfort in that.

That was then

By November 2010, China seemed to have changed its tune when, one week before the UN Cancun Conference, it vowed to “effectively control” emissions over the next five years. It also reiterated its dedication to reduce its carbon intensity by 40 – 45% by 2020.

According to Xie Zhenhua, deputy director of the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China has cut carbon emissions by about 1.5 billion tones. This is a result of energy-saving and emission-reduction measures in its 11th Five-Year Plan (2005-2010). “The size of the emission reduction is greater than any other country in the world. This is China’s contribution (to preventing global climate change),” said Xie. Considering that China is the world’s biggest emitter of carbon dioxide, this is less impressive than it sounds.

Looking ahead

What is heartening is the fact that China is dedicated to reducing carbon emissions, carbon intensity and the effects of climate change. It’s been suggested that China might even provide a leading example for the rest of the world. It starts with engaging local municipalities, education and incentives and is being driven by a government that really has no choice.

Pollution is expensive; it costs the country 8 – 12% of its GDP annually, it’s estimated that 460 000 people die from pollution-related causes every year and it has led to large-scale desertification, which will probably never be reversed.

Jonathan Watts, Asia Environment correspondent for the Guardian, says that China’s environmental problems are worse than assumed, but that it’s “doing more to try and solve them than people give them credit for”.

This can be seen in the country’s recognition of its dire water problem (50% of China’s water is considered too contaminated for human consumption), its programme to try and reclaim desert land (which is a very long-term plan – at least 300 years), its intention to address problematic farming methods and the tightening of environmental laws, which are currently vague, ambiguous and not adequately enforced.

China’s environmental problems are many, and attempts to combat them will be fraught with challenges, most notably the continued need for development, but with the government and NGOs finally agreeing to certain measures, and growing public awareness there could be blue skies on China’s horizon.

Australia: New Carbon Cutting Laws

August 26th, 2010

758179_mapAustralia’s Australian Capital Territory (ACT) government said today that they will be enacting tough carbon cutting laws.

They said that their climate change and greenhouse gas reduction bill would be setting a target of cutting down carbon emissions by 40% by 2020 from their 1990 levels, and that the cut would rise to 80% by 2050!

That would be amazing!

The aim is that nearly 400 000 people would become carbon neutral by 2060. If it’s possible in Australia then it should be possible all over the world! IT seems there are calls within Australian government to step up to the responsibility required to alleviating the issue of carbon emissions.

See the full story here.

Hope Australia can do it! And even more so, I hope the rest of the world who is not being environmentally responsible takes note!

Jade

x

South African Based Company, Optimal Energy, Revolutionises Electric Car

July 14th, 2010

imageOptimal Energy, a local company with offices in Cape Town, has their revolutionary electric vehicle Joule on display in Geneva at the 80th International Motor Show.

This vehicle has been designed by South African-born Keith Helfet, and was developed from a static display model into a pre-production prototype courtesy of Zagato’s Total Design Centre.

Hand-built near Port Elizabeth by Hi-Tech Automotive, the Joule is expected to become the benchmark for Optimal Energy’s further ventures. Focused exclusively on achieving the perfect electric car, Optimal Energy are pioneers in creating a new kind of car and subsequently will lead the way towards new ways of buying vehicles and ownership.

The company’s vision is to see the inefficient usage of the world’s finite energy sources changed. By focusing their time, expertise and energy on discovering world class solutions for urban transport, Optimal Energy are taking steps forward in creating a world where energy can be used efficiently, decrease 2010_06_17_Front_3Quarterpollution that affects climate change as well as making the electric vehicle options available to the public.

They are doing all this in the form of Joule, Africa’s first “electric engineering masterpiece”.  The vehicle is said to offer “an optimal, no-compromise, zero emission urban driving experience”

Sounds like an environmental dream! If your interested in finding out more, visit Optimal Energy’s website, or call them on 021 462 7804.

Hopefully the Joule will be the perfect way to drive economically in more ways than one!

Jade

x

Green Living Tip #6

June 29th, 2010

Grow your own, eat your own.

1073218_baby_tomatoesNow that you’ve started you’re own veggie compost box, put that nutritious compost to good use by starting your own little veggie patch at home!

What better way to live green than by planting, growing and eating your very own vegetables? And the peelings and cut off from the carrots of broccoli that you take out of your garden will inevitably go back into it – in your compost box.

What’s even better about your own veggie garden is you can get the kids involved and spend quality time with them while they learn about healthy foods, and you can eat your veggies in the safe knowledge that no bad chemicals were used to grow them – they will be 100% organic!

When dealing with insects or pests that may attack your new plants there are a whole range of natural organic pesticides.

Some easy-to-grow plants are courgettes (baby marrow), mange tout (sugar pea) and broccoli. If you grow these in your garden it means you won’t have to buy imported produce that have had to be shipped/flown in meaning more carbon emissions.

You can let your children choose their own veggie to grow and help them with the responsibility of caring for the plant and ensuring it’s growth – this will get your child interested in the plant world as well as learn about the responsibilities of looking after things in life.

Let me know how your new organic veggie patches go!

Jade

x

Greenpeace on climate control

June 10th, 2010

In a recent online article Greenpeace talk about how renewable resources can create around 8.5 million jobs by 2030!1214808_decommissioned

Their whole campaign is to try get countries and corporations to see the value of investing in people rather than “dirty and dangerous” fossil fuels.

If these statistics are true then why aren’t these countries and corporations convinced?

Greenpeace’s argument is pretty persuasive numbers-wise – according to them the global market for renewable energy sources could be worth around 600 billion dollars by 2030.

While some countries are pledging to lower their emissions, there has not been an across-the-board emissions cut target.

Greenpeace have even proffered a detailed report on how to go about cutting carbon emissions while concurrently building economic growth.

So, why is no one listening closely to Greenpeace? You can read the full article here: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/jobs/Renewables-can-create-85-mn-jobs-Greenpeace/articleshow/6019620.cms

And tell me what you think.

Jade

x