Archive for the ‘Energy’ category

A Swedish green affair

January 25th, 2011

A Swedish family is taking living green seriously as they enter a year-long carbon-reducing experiment. The family of four have set themselves a challenge; to radically reduce their carbon footprint of seven tonnes a year down to just one tonne. In an inspirational move Nils Lindell and his wife, Alicja with their two children Hannah and Jonathan have pledged to live in a solar powered house.

For people around the world who are at a loss as to what changes to make in their daily lives to live an eco-friendly and environmentally aware life, this experiment will hopefully give new insights into the ‘green’ world.

The catch of the experiment is that the Lindell family are not doing it alone; the house they will be living in is especially designed to help people use less energy and the technology afforded to the family is not easily acquired in a normal household setting.

The house, located in Stockholm’s suburbs, is equipped with support from Sweden’s top brands. Volvo has supplied an electric car, along with the solar-powered car-port, other names include A-Hus (housing experts), Vattenfall (Sweden’s largest energy provider), Siemens and the local supermarket chain, ICA.

The family are ready to take on the challenge of reducing their carbon emissions so drastically but the real challenge would be to successfully complete an experiment like this without such overwhelming backing. While the data to be collected from the experiment will be used to ascertain whether a one-tonne life is plausible, it is still a far cry from having every man and woman on the street equipped with the tools to do so.

For most the cost of an electric car and charging portal as well as installation of solar power panels, energy-saving lights and plumbing is just too much to even think of. However, major corporations that can afford such technology will benefit from the experiment as it will shed light on the possibilities of living green.

It will be interesting to see how much the Lindell family will have to change their daily routines to fit into the new lifestyle, and what effect that may have on the way that they are accustomed to living.

For now, not everyone is expected to spend a fortune on reducing their carbon footprint but remember the little things count; unplug appliances that aren’t in use, try use public transport as much as possible and take shorter showers. You’ll already be doing something towards making the world a healthier place.

It’s Noah’s Ark but not as we know it

January 17th, 2011

In the movie 2012 (roundly criticised

By Rene Ehrhardt, via Wikimedia Commons

by scientists for being wildly unrealistic), the world as we know it ends in a great flood and people only survive by virtue of giant

arks – in the same vein as Noah’s famous vessel but infinitely

more advanced. Old Noah has done more than inspire

Hollywood; he has also provided the basic idea from which other great minds have leapt, such as Russian architect Alexander Remizov, who has designed an eco-friendly dome capable of withstanding biblical floods.

Remizov’s dome, unimaginatively called “The Ark” is designed to be constructed in a very short period of time (under six months), uses eco-friendly materials and is entirely self-sustaining. It can be built for life on land or on water and is capable of withstanding earthquakes and tornados.

Remizov designed the dome with one of his colleagues, Lev Britvin, in connection with the International Union of Architects’ Disaster Relief programme. In line with the principles of the union’s “Architecture and Renewable Energy Sources” programme, the Ark doesn’t require external support systems, can be constructed quickly in adverse climate conditions and its construction has minimal impact on the environment.

The Ark is built from wood, steel, high-tech plastic, and solar panels and can be scaled to accommodate between 50 and 10 000 people. Instead of glass, Remizov uses a high-tech durable and self-cleaning foil, which is transparent so that indoor plants can grow. An indoor jungle will help establish a microclimate, while energy will be generated from the sun and wind.

In an email interview with the Star, Remizov said, “I like the idea of creating an independent-from-power-networks building that can be constructed in the most beautiful places, including the water surface, while respecting the environment. The building (would have an) organised community which has everything necessary for its prosperity and growth.”

Remizov is currently in discussions with investors and the Russian Council of Sustainable Buildings, to bring his vision to life.

Other ideas for futuristic, self-sustaining biospheres include:

Lilypad, a floating ecopolis is designed by Vincent Callebaut Architects as an “auto-sufficient amphibious city”. It is based on the capable design of the lily pads found in the Amazon River basin and incorporates all aspects of eco-living to achieve a “positive energetic balance with zero carbon emission”. It will be able to accommodate up to 50 000 people.

The Magic Mountains designed by the CEBO/Chongqing University architect team is a series of green buildings in the business district in Chongqing, China which are built to mimic the surrounding mountainous landscape. The unique design is not simply for aesthetics but will also optimise the passive heating and cooling system and reduce energy consumption. The Magic Mountains are effectively a self-contained city in which only walking and cycling will be permitted.

For more futuristic eco-buildings visit Design Swan.

Hydrogen cars aim to steel the green car market from their electric counterparts

January 17th, 2011

Electric cars steel all the limelight but

This image was created by Chris 73

when it comes to greener, cleaner cars, but Japanese car manufacturers are infavour of hydrogen powered vehicles. Honda, Nissan and Toyota have announced a partnership with ten Japanese energy companies in a drive to lower the production price of hydrogen fuel cell cars and build 100 fuelling stations in Tokyo, Osaka, Fukuoka and Nagoya by 2015.

A statement issued by the companies said: “With an aim to significantly reduce the amount of CO2 emitted by the transportation sector, automakers and hydrogen fuel suppliers will work together to expand the introduction of FCVs and develop the hydrogen supply network throughout Japan.”

Toyota is something of a pioneer in the green car market; it’s already the leader in hybrid vehicle sales and intends to sell only plug-in hybrid and battery-powered cars come 2012. It has also made significant strides in the mission to make hydrogen cars more affordable and address some of the technical problems which have plagued the development of product-ready hydrogen-powered technology.

According to Takeshi Uchiyamada, Toyota’s executive vice president for research and product development, the company has cut production costs to less than $100,000 and it intends to halve the price by the time sales begin (in 2015). In an interview at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Uchiyamada said, “I have high expectations for fuel-cell vehicles as a candidate for next-generation cars. Over the past several years, we’ve seen many of the outstanding technical issues solved.”

Initially, Toyota will sell its hydrogen cars in countries and cities with developed fuelling systems, such as Japan, Germany and California, USA, but the dream is to expand to global automobile markets.

Meanwhile, Honda has been leasing hydrogen sedans in LA for around two years now. LA has a number of hydrogen fuelling stations, which makes it one of the best markets in which to test the efficiency of hydrogen cars in real life. It has similar programmes in Japan and a handful of countries in Europe.

One of the advantages of hydrogen fuel cells is that they are more powerful than electric engines and, according to Uchiyamada, the cruising distance is almost comparable to petrol engine cars. The two biggest disadvantages of hydrogen cars are the cost and lack of fuelling networks. But as more car manufacturers take the plunge and dedicate themselves to developing the technology properly, these concerns will be quickly overcome. For instance, Toyota’s current solution to cost involves high-pressure hydrogen tanks and fuel-cell stacks.

With a little more forward thinking we could all soon be puttering around in cars that are no more toxic than the water vapour they emit, and that would be driving pleasure indeed.

Tidal power in full force, or not

December 20th, 2010

On the surface tidal power sounds like a no-brainer; unlike wind or solar power it is consistent (there’s nothing quite as dependable as the tides) and because the Earth is 70% water, there are potentially endless locations to set up turbines. But it’s not that simple. For a start, wind and solar power have grabbed all the glory, not to mention the funding, so tidal power is under-researched and remains under-estimated. It’s also rather expensive, and because the technology is still evolving (quite rapidly) it doesn’t make sense to spend huge amounts of money on systems that will be outdated as soon as construction is complete. And, because it is under-researched, scientists are unsure of the impact tidal power projects will have on the marine environment.

All these obstacles not withstanding, tidal power is viewed as a viable alternative source of energy and governments, universities and private companies are investing considerable time and money into research, systems development and practical tests.

For instance:

  • Rance Tidal Power Station was built in 1966 and is still in operation today. It’s on the estuary of the Rance River in Brittany, France and is operated by Électricité de France. In addition to being the first tidal power station in the world, it is also the largest. Twenty-four turbines generate power using the tidal barrage technique. Power generation peaks at 240 megawatts and it supplies 0.012% of France’s total power needs. Rance Tidal Power Station also serves an important tourism service, as it attracts in the region of 200 000 tourists per year.
  • SeaGen is a tidal stream generator located in Strangford Narrows, Northern Ireland. It’s four times as powerful as any other tidal stream generator and generates 1.2 megawatts per day. It is run by Sea Generation Ltd, which has a five-year operating licence.
  • The first tidal energy project on the US west coast is designated for Puget Sound in Washington State. The project is being driven by the University of Washington, which is currently evaluating potential sites and determining methods to measure the project’s environmental impact. The plan is to construct two 30-foot-wide turbines in Admiralty Inlet, which is the main entrance to Puget Sound. The turbines are expected to generate an average of 100 kilowatts of electricity.
  • The Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia, Canada is the site of another tidal power project. This one is called FORCE (Fundy Ocean Research Centre for Energy) and will use four undersea cables capable of containing 64 power generating devices. Each cable is expected to 16 megawatts of energy. It’s estimated that the Nova Scotia coastline could generate enough energy to rival the fossil fuels coming out of Saudi Arabia.
  • Plans for the River Mersey Barrage in Liverpool, UK, are under threat. The UK government has withdrawn support after feasibility studies revealed that it would cost twice as much to build as originally estimated. There are also concerns for marine life. But the company behind the project, Peel Energy, is determined to carry on and has invited the public to review the plans and air their views. The company will promote the Mersey Tidal Power project at 10 venues near the Mersey waterfront to assess public opinion on the location, physical aspects, impacts, benefits and opportunities. If things go as planned, Peel Energy hopes to have the project operational by 2020.

Wind power vs. solar power

December 8th, 2010

You want to do the right thing and install an alternative energy system in your home, but you’re not sure whether a wind or solar powered system is best for you. There are many factors to consider, such as initial capital outlay, space, maintenance costs and efficiency. But what it basically boils down to is the consistency of your local weather patterns. If you live in a sheltered cove or valley then there is no point in splashing out on a wind turbine. If you live in a veritable wind tunnel then a wind generator might be the way to go. Certain places are more suited to solar power. Take the central South African region for instance, the area has more sun than just about anywhere else on Earth.

Ok, so it’s not as simple as basic geography. The size of your estate is also important. Wind turbines are neither small nor unobtrusive, at least not if you want one that will deliver its money’s worth. Smaller turbines with smaller blades will not provide as much energy as larger systems. If you want to make the most of the windy conditions, you’ll need the room to erect a decent sized wind turbine and you’ll have to make your peace with the fact that it won’t add to the aesthetic of your property (although it will add to the property value).

Solar panels, on the other hand, can fit onto your roof; you even get roof tiles made out of solar panels these days, so they take up no room at all. Designers have also taken looks into account and made solar panels much more attractive than they used to be.

Now you know where you stand in terms of prevailing climate and available space, what about capital outlay? Solar and wind power systems have come down dramatically in price over the last year or so. It’s possible to get a basic residential wind turbine for as little as R5,600 but they can go all the way up to R70,000. It’s possible to get basic solar power kits, which contain everything you need to get your solar power system going, for as little as R1,200. Individual solar panels start at around R570, but these are very small. Larger varieties usually start at around R2,300.

With regard to maintenance costs, solar panels tend to require less maintenance than wind turbines, which are more vulnerable to wear and tear and are exposed to the elements.

In terms of efficiency, various studies have shown various results. And results seem to be dependent on who funds the studies. It’s no surprise that those with a vested interest in wind power will find that solar power comes in a meagre second and vice versa. Here you might want to look at the quality of the products you buy (which will also be affected by price), the size available and your energy saving goals. Conduct your own research and talk to professionals, but remember to take everything with a pinch of salt.

Both systems will pay for themselves within in a matter of years and with the rising costs of electricity, the pay-back periods are getting shorter all the time.

Objectively speaking, and if you can afford it, the best alternative energy systems use solar and wind power, as they augment each other. But if that is not an option, many experts recommend solar power for residential use. Solar panels are able to gather energy even in weak sunlight and overcast conditions and solar batteries will store excess energy until needed, while wind turbines need a minimum wind speed of 9km/h to operate effectively.

When it comes time to decide, the most important factor is often initial cost, and with that in mind, solar power seems to come up trumps.

Small Changes = Big Saving

August 31st, 2010

1181522_yellow_window_2Last week I did a post here about some great ways to save energy and reduce your electricity bill.

Here are a few more ways that you can easily save money while using less energy.

1. Turn your water heater down: By turning your water heater down to 120 degrees and insulating exposed pipes you can save energy without having colder water.

2. Use your microwave: As hesitant as I am to say this (I’m not the biggest fan of Microwaves) apparently using your microwave instead of a regular oven saves you two-thirds of the energy you would normally be chowing.

3. Fill it up: When you use your dishwasher or washing machine, make sure you wash a full load of dishes or clothes. It saves water and the energy used to heat the water. And you’ll use less washing detergents.

4. Turn your air conditioner down: By turning your air conditioner down by just one degree you will reduce your energy usage by 3%! And you probably won’t even notice the difference in temperature.

5. Shutters/Shades: In the winter, open them. Make sure your windows are sealed properly but let in as much heat and light as possible – natural light is free light. In the summer, close them. Black out blinds/curtains provide great protection from the sun’s strong ray.

6. Close your fridge: By constantly opening and closing, or leaving open your refrigerator door you’re letting all the cold air out, meaning the fridge needs to use more energy to re-cool itself.

7. Fix leaks: Avoid water wastage by fixing any water leaks big or small you have. Especially if the water that is leaking is heated water. Your water heater will be working overtime to replace the water that has leaked out thus using more energy than is actually needed.

So, there you go. A few really easy steps that you can take to save energy while putting money back into your pocket!

Good luck,

Jade

x

Facebook Gets Green

August 17th, 2010

1208422_woman_using_computerGreenpeace International, as part of their Climate Campaign, have turned their eco-friendly eyes onto social media giant Facebook.

They are asking for your help in getting Facebook.com running on 100% renewable energy. All they are asking of you is that if you have a Facebook profile to please join this group: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=311700724500 and invite all your friends to join too!

According to Greenpeace International, Facebook is building a rather large new data centre in Oregon, US and they plan to run it using dirty energy.

As the second most visited site in the US, and one of the world’s top sites, the company has a responsibility to clean up its act and spend some time and energy supporting the struggle to clean up the world.

Greenpeace International plans to use Facebook itself to encourage the company to be more environmentally responsible and active.

Let’s hope that Facebook gets the picture!

Hope you join the group!

Jade

x

Solar Plane’s First 24-Hour Flight

July 7th, 2010

798724_aeroplane_series_3A solar-powered plane took off from Switzerland’s airfield Payerne for it’s first ever 24-hour test flight.

The makers of this experimental plane hope to eventually be able to fly the aircraft around the world using only energy collected from the sun.

Pilot Andre Borschberg left Payerne at 05:00 GMT (7am our time) and by mid-morning was flying at approximately 9,850 feet (3,000 metres).They planned to have the aircraft flying at 27,900 feet (8,500 metres) by evening, and then would make a decision as to whether the flight could continue using solar power stored in it’s batteries.

Find out more about the test flight here.

Seems the sun’s rays don’t only gives us energy but our planes too!

Jade

x

BP Update

June 22nd, 2010
The Gulf of Mexico

The Gulf of Mexico

Since 20 April 2010 the rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico as been spewing out massive amounts of oil into a large portion of the immediate area, and the effects are global.

The amounts of oil leakage to date: 126.3 million gallons (worst case scenario)

Here is an interesting look at the amounts being spilled:

http://www.freep.com/article/20100622/NEWS07/6220346/1322/Just-how-big-a-mess-is-the-gulf-oil-spill

On their website, BP have released official responses to the spill, updating the amounts recovered in their efforts to fix the problem.

You can read them here:

http://www.bp.com/extendedsectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=40&contentId=7061813

According to BP they have spent $US 2 Billion on the spill so far. This money has gone out to help stop the spew, grants for the Gulf states, claims paid to affected businesses and individuals and costs incurred by the US government.

It seems however, that as the saga continues that BP continue to upset the media and the US with their failure to relinquish correct information as well as the “notorious slip” of BP boss Tony Hayward who it seems has passed the buck.

The British giant are under immense pressure however, and are being held accountable by the US and in the media – it seems this is one controversy that a major corporation will not be able to escape unscathed.

Let’s just hope for the sake of the immediate environment, the affected wildlife and the industries that this environmental disaster can be curtailed as efficiently as possible!

Jade

x

Greenpeace Training South Africa!

June 17th, 2010

1178063_solar_panelThis is a beautifully made short video about Greenpeace’s efforts in South Africa.

It was filmed in Jericho, a rural village approximately 80 km outside of Johannesburg and shows Greenpeace activists working with the students from the local school in an effort to teach them about solar training.

A select group of students were chosen and got to work with the Greenpeace activists including Michael Gotz, a solar trainer from Switzerland for a few weeks.

The trainees then held an open day during which fellow students and members of the community were allowed to go and ask questions giving the trainees a chance to further spread the knowlegde they had been given.

This is such a positive look at Greenpeace’s work in South Africa and well worth a watch, and the music in the video is wonderful too!

Have a watch here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DrWEubF5Hg

Jade

x